<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Critique: Presidential Candidate Websites</title>
	<link>http://www.rioleo.org/critique-presidential-candidate-websites.php</link>
	<description>Writings and musings on the latest web trends and life, advertising, design, fonts, and news from an avid and prolific web designer.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 18:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Contented: content that makes people happy &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Analysis of candidates&#8217; sites cuts both ways</title>
		<link>http://www.rioleo.org/critique-presidential-candidate-websites.php#comment-1759</link>
		<dc:creator>Contented: content that makes people happy &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Analysis of candidates&#8217; sites cuts both ways</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 04:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.rioleo.org/critique-presidential-candidate-websites.php#comment-1759</guid>
		<description>[...] Rio Akasaka compares home pages for accessibility, validity and speed — not content; opinions on colour schemes sneak in. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Rio Akasaka compares home pages for accessibility, validity and speed — not content; opinions on colour schemes sneak in. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Candidate Websites: A Cursory Glance &#171; The Smidgin</title>
		<link>http://www.rioleo.org/critique-presidential-candidate-websites.php#comment-1738</link>
		<dc:creator>Candidate Websites: A Cursory Glance &#171; The Smidgin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 15:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.rioleo.org/critique-presidential-candidate-websites.php#comment-1738</guid>
		<description>[...] (1/8/07): I later found this comparison, which is focuses more on the technical details and actually attempts to be objective. My [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] (1/8/07): I later found this comparison, which is focuses more on the technical details and actually attempts to be objective. My [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sawyer</title>
		<link>http://www.rioleo.org/critique-presidential-candidate-websites.php#comment-1735</link>
		<dc:creator>Sawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 19:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.rioleo.org/critique-presidential-candidate-websites.php#comment-1735</guid>
		<description>It's incredible that with all of the candidates out there with massive budgets, they can't produce a site that completely meets at least one part of standards/accessibility?

Although, being a fan of Edwards, I happen to like the outcome here, but obviously all of their pages need work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s incredible that with all of the candidates out there with massive budgets, they can&#8217;t produce a site that completely meets at least one part of standards/accessibility?</p>
<p>Although, being a fan of Edwards, I happen to like the outcome here, but obviously all of their pages need work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Merv</title>
		<link>http://www.rioleo.org/critique-presidential-candidate-websites.php#comment-1734</link>
		<dc:creator>Merv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 16:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.rioleo.org/critique-presidential-candidate-websites.php#comment-1734</guid>
		<description>Nice Job! I don't think I have ever seen a side by side comparison of the various websites like that. Pretty cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice Job! I don&#8217;t think I have ever seen a side by side comparison of the various websites like that. Pretty cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
